PCMark 8 Video Editing

Video Editing v2 Part 2 (Creative 3.0 test suite)

This workload uses FFmpeg to apply video enhancement filters to a high bitrate H.264 video and then encode it to a format suitable for distribution. The FFmpeg binary used is custom built by Futuremark using a development version of the source available from the project's code repository. The test applies a deshaking filter to a source video at 3,840 x 2160 (4K UHD) before scaling down and outputting at 1,920 x 1,080 (1080p).

PCMark 8 4K Video Editing

Part 2 test

  • Asus Sabertooth X99 (3GHz/4.3GHz)
  • MSI X99S MPower (3GHz/4.25GHz)
  • Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5 (3GHz/4.2GHz)
  • Gigabyte X99-Gaming 5P (3GHz/4.3GHz)
  • MSI X99A XPOWER AC (3GHz/4.35GHz)
  • Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P (3GHz/4.35GHz)
  • ASRock X99 Extreme 11 (3GHz/4.25GHz)
  • Gigabyte X99M-Gaming 5 (3GHz/4.35GHz)
  • Asus X99-Pro (3GHz/4.35GHz)
  • Asus X99 Deluxe (3GHz/4.25GHz)
  • ASRock Fatal1ty X99M Killer (3GHz/4.3GHz)
  • MSI X99S SLI Plus (3GHz/4.3GHz)
  • EVGA X99 Micro (3GHz/4.2GHz)
    • 137
    • 112
    • 137
    • 114
    • 137
    • 116
    • 138
    • 112
    • 138
    • 110
    • 138
    • 111
    • 138
    • 114
    • 138
    • 111
    • 138
    • 111
    • 138
    • 114
    • 142
    • 112
    • 142
    • 112
    • 143
    • 115
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Seconds, lower is better
  • Stock
  • Overclocked

PCMark 8 Photo Editing V2

This workload involves making a series of adjustments to a set of photographs using ImageMagik - an open-source image processing library to adjust brightness, contrast, saturation and gamma. When a favourable balance is found, the changes are then applied to the rest of the images in the set. TIFF files up to 67MB in size are used.

PCMark 8 Photo Editing V2

Load image matrix + adjusting times

  • Asus Sabertooth X99 (3GHz/4.3GHz)
  • MSI X99S MPower (3GHz/4.25GHz)
  • ASRock X99 Extreme 11 (3GHz/4.25GHz)
  • Gigabyte X99M-Gaming 5 (3GHz/4.35GHz)
  • Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5 (3GHz/4.2GHz)
  • Asus X99-Pro (3GHz/4.35GHz)
  • ASRock Fatal1ty X99M Killer (3GHz/4.3GHz)
  • Asus X99 Deluxe (3GHz/4.25GHz)
  • EVGA X99 Micro (3GHz/4.2GHz)
  • MSI X99S SLI Plus (3GHz/4.3GHz)
  • Gigabyte X99-Gaming 5P (3GHz/4.3GHz)
  • Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P (3GHz/4.35GHz)
  • MSI X99A XPOWER AC (3GHz/4.35GHz)
    • 32
    • 27
    • 32
    • 28
    • 32
    • 29
    • 32
    • 29
    • 33
    • 29
    • 33
    • 27
    • 34
    • 27
    • 34
    • 28
    • 34
    • 28
    • 35
    • 28
    • 36
    • 30
    • 36
    • 31
    • 36
    • 32
0
10
20
30
40
Seconds, lower is better
  • Stock
  • Overclocked

Discuss this in the forums

Posted by SuperHans123 - Mon Jun 22 2015 10:23

You state in your conclusion that the board is mediocre yet give it an Approved award.
Makes no sense.
I doubt great audio on board would be one of the main buying decision points for anyone spending this amount of money on a motherboard.

Posted by Combatus - Mon Jun 22 2015 10:34

supermuchurios
You state in your conclusion that the board is mediocre yet give it an Approved award.
Makes no sense.
I doubt great audio on board would be one of the main buying decision points for anyone spending this amount of money on a motherboard.
We said apart from the audio results it's mediocre, it's not mediocre in general - no board is perfect :) We have to consider users that would view the audio as important and may not be fussed by features such as overclocking/testing tools or on-board WiFi. In the same way, it's not as appealing or well-rounded as the Asus X99-Pro, for example, which scores better and gets a premium grade award, while costing the same.

Posted by Waynio - Tue Jun 23 2015 14:23

These gaming 5 series motherboards enabled me to use onboard audio, as good as a good soundcard.

Posted by SchizoFrog - Tue Jun 23 2015 22:05

Combatus
We said apart from the audio results it's mediocre, it's not mediocre in general - no board is perfect :)
Maybe I am being over pedantic here but... if 'apart from the audio' all aspects of the motherboard are mediocre, how is that not mediocre in general? To then give it an Approved Award is to approve mediocrity.

Anyway, I am thoroughly bored sick of these super-high end X99 motherboard reviews. It seems forever since we saw anything else. I understand that no other new motherboard chipsets (or several other aspects of a PC for that matter) have been released recently but there is so much more that could be reviewed or articles written, especially for a modding site. Many of these articles/reviews now read like generic advertisements with a few facts and figures thrown in.

Oh well, it is what it is... but it has been a LONG time since I felt I learned anything from an article/review here on Bit-Tech.
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.